Tĩnh Gia
District in Thanh Hóa Province
Contents: Subdivision
The population in Tĩnh Gia as well as related information and services (Wikipedia, Google, images).
icon links to further information about a selected division including its population structure (age groups).| Name | Status | Population Census 2009-04-01 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tĩnh Gia | District | 214,665 | |
| Anh Sơn | Rural Commune | 4,815 | → |
| Bình Minh | Rural Commune | 4,790 | → |
| Các Sơn | Rural Commune | 8,044 | → |
| Định Hải | Rural Commune | 2,737 | → |
| Hải An | Rural Commune | 5,153 | → |
| Hải Bình | Rural Commune | 10,721 | → |
| Hải Châu | Rural Commune | 9,424 | → |
| Hải Hà | Rural Commune | 7,758 | → |
| Hải Hòa | Rural Commune | 6,773 | → |
| Hải Lĩnh | Rural Commune | 5,765 | → |
| Hải Nhân | Rural Commune | 8,706 | → |
| Hải Ninh | Rural Commune | 11,114 | → |
| Hải Thanh | Rural Commune | 15,205 | → |
| Hải Thượng | Rural Commune | 7,454 | → |
| Hải Yến | Rural Commune | 3,524 | → |
| Hùng Sơn | Rural Commune | 4,126 | → |
| Mai Lâm | Rural Commune | 6,678 | → |
| Nghi Sơn | Rural Commune | 6,995 | → |
| Ngọc Lĩnh | Rural Commune | 5,716 | → |
| Nguyên Bình | Rural Commune | 7,742 | → |
| Ninh Hải | Rural Commune | 4,494 | → |
| Phú Lâm | Rural Commune | 2,885 | → |
| Phú Sơn | Rural Commune | 4,664 | → |
| Tân Dân | Rural Commune | 4,875 | → |
| Tân Trường | Rural Commune | 7,005 | → |
| Thanh Sơn | Rural Commune | 6,781 | → |
| Thanh Thủy | Rural Commune | 5,901 | → |
| Tĩnh Gia | Township | 4,595 | → |
| Tĩnh Hải | Rural Commune | 5,193 | → |
| Triêu Dương | Rural Commune | 3,224 | → |
| Trúc Lâm | Rural Commune | 4,567 | → |
| Trường Lâm | Rural Commune | 7,910 | → |
| Tùng Lâm | Rural Commune | 3,795 | → |
| Xuân Lâm | Rural Commune | 5,536 | → |
| Thanh Hóa | Province | 3,400,595 |
Source: General Statistics Office of Vietnam (web).
Explanation: Communes as defined in 2009 and districts follow the definiton of 2018. The computation of boundaries and population figures for districts is based on the tabulated communes of 2009. Thus, slight discrepancies to the actual situation are possible in few cases. Area figures are derived from geospatial data.